Imagine risking it all on a single, high-stakes gamble—only to watch your fortune crumble. That’s exactly what happened to private lender Ben Madsen, who now faces the devastating prospect of bankruptcy and the loss of his $11.9 million Sydney mansion after a jaw-dropping $136 million bet on pub baron Jon Adgemis went catastrophically wrong. But here’s where it gets controversial: Was this a calculated risk gone awry, or a reckless move fueled by overconfidence? SUBSCRIBE TO READ MORE and dive into the full story.
Sale of the year now on! Unlock this gripping tale and more with our limited-time offer. For just $4 for 4 weeks (then $44 every 4 weeks*), you’ll get:
- Unlimited access to our app and website
- A digital version of today’s paper
- Daily puzzles and Mind Games to keep you sharp
- Full digital access to The Wall Street Journal
- Subscriber-exclusive newsletters and early access to tomorrow’s headlines
No lock-in contract—cancel anytime. Read the fine print for details.
LIMITED TIME ONLY: Or, for the best value, grab our 12-month offer at just $6 a week for the first year ($24 min. cost), then $44 every 4 weeks.*
Why subscribe? With full digital access, you’ll enjoy:
- Expert news and commentary, available anytime on web and app
- A seamless digital newspaper experience, including liftouts and archives
- Exclusive subscriber emails to keep you ahead of the curve
- Complimentary access to The Wall Street Journal
- Daily brain-teasers like crosswords, sudoku, and more with Mind Games
And this is the part most people miss: High-stakes lending isn’t just about big money—it’s a game of trust, strategy, and sometimes, sheer luck. What lessons can we learn from Madsen’s downfall? Is the world of private lending as glamorous as it seems, or is it a minefield waiting to explode? Let us know your thoughts in the comments—we’re eager to hear your take on this polarizing story!
