The Seattle Mariners are considering a reunion that could spark debate among fans and analysts alike. With the recent trade of catcher Harry Ford to the Nationals, the team is now open to bringing back free agent Mitch Garver, a move that may surprise many.
But is this a wise decision? Garver, who will turn 35 next month, just completed a two-year contract worth $24 million, which he signed in December 2023. The Mariners had high hopes, envisioning him as a primary designated hitter and a backup to Cal Raleigh behind the plate. However, Garver's offensive performance fell short of expectations, with an 88 wRC+ over 720 plate appearances in the 2024-25 seasons.
And here's where it gets interesting: despite his underwhelming numbers, Garver's contract included a $12 million mutual option for 2026. The Mariners declined this option, instead opting for a $1 million buyout, making him a free agent. This decision was likely influenced by Garver's 2025 season, where he batted .209 with an 86 wRC+ in 290 plate appearances. While he improved his strikeout rate, his overall offensive output remained similar to 2024.
Now, the Mariners find themselves in a unique position. With Ford traded and catching prospects still in Single-A, there's a gap to fill. A reunion with Garver at a lower cost could be a pragmatic move. A one-year deal worth $6-8 million would be a sensible investment for a backup catcher role, especially considering the team's current payroll projections for 2026.
However, there's a catch (no pun intended). Garver's defensive skills have been a concern. In 2025, he started 42 games as a catcher, but his defensive metrics were less than impressive. His framing skills were below average, and his blocking and throwing abilities didn't fare well in advanced metrics. This raises the question: can the Mariners afford to take a chance on a catcher with declining defensive abilities?
There are some positive signs in Garver's offensive profile, though. His hard-hit rate and exit velocity improved in 2025, indicating potential for a rebound. But is that enough to justify a reunion? The Mariners must weigh the risks and rewards, especially with Garver's age and defensive shortcomings.
What do you think? Is bringing back Garver a smart move for the Mariners, or should they look elsewhere? Share your thoughts in the comments and let's spark a lively discussion on this intriguing potential reunion.
